Supreme Court—Civil Appeals—IBC, 2016—Sections 7, 9, 10, 12A and 65—CIRP initiated through fraudulent and collusive Section 9 application—AA empowered to recall admission founded on fraudulent jurisdictional facts; however, CIRP, having become in rem, may continue if larger stakeholder interests warrant—NCLAT judgment set aside; CIRP restored for fresh decision on continuation. Date of Judgement—30.09.2026.
Orris Infrastructure Private Limited V. Rakesh Kumar Gupta and Ors.
By Hania Zahoor
The reportRead the court document for its full terms
Continue reading
View court archive →More from Supreme Court
Santosh Gurung V. State of Sikkim
Supreme Court—Criminal Appeal—conviction under Sections 376(2)(i), 302, 201 IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act—circumstantial evidence—last-seen circumstance doubtful; recoveries, DNA/FSL reports and shawl inconclusive; Section...
By Hania ZahoorRead case file →
The State of Himachal Pradesh V. Anchla @Chanchla
Supreme Court—criminal appeal against acquittal under Section 302 IPC—double murder based on circumstantial evidence. Applying Rajesh Prasad v. State of Bihar and Hanumant/Sharad Birdhichand Sarda,...
By Hania ZahoorRead case file →
Supreme Court: Personal notions of morality cannot guide bail or criminal trial decisions
The Supreme Court has cautioned judges against allowing their personal beliefs or notions of morality to influence decisions in bail matters or criminal trials. A...
By Sheikh RayeesRead case file →