In a recent ruling, the Allahabad High Court voiced concerns over the stark warning messages displayed on signboards outside military installations, advocating for a shift towards gentler language to convey security warnings. The Court’s decision came during the case of Etvir Limbu, a Nepali citizen who unlawfully entered an Air Force station while inebriated earlier this year.
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav, presiding over the case, expressed reservations about phrases like “dekhte hi goli maar di jayegi” (will be shot on sight), arguing that such language could have adverse effects, especially on children and the general public. Instead, the Court proposed using softer language such as “strict action would be taken” to convey the same message.
While granting bail to Limbu, who faced charges under the Indian Penal Code and the Official Secrets Act, the Court emphasized the need for a reevaluation of security measures to deter unauthorized intrusions into defense premises. Despite efforts to bolster security following past terrorist incidents, instances of trespassing continue to rise, as revealed during the proceedings.
Acknowledging the importance of preventing trespassing, the Court urged for a reconsideration of the language used in warning signs, cautioning against the direct and potentially alarming phrases currently employed. Despite the gravity of the offense, the Court decided in favor of Limbu’s release on bail, noting his lack of ill intent and the absence of evidence tampering concerns.
Representatives for both the accused and the Air Force presented their arguments during the proceedings, with Advocate Pradeep Kumar representing Limbu and Additional Solicitor General SP Singh along with Advocate Purnendu Kumar Singh representing the Air Force.
In its ruling, the Allahabad High Court not only addressed the specific case at hand but also called attention to broader issues surrounding security communication, advocating for a more considerate approach in conveying warnings to the public.
