Section 164 Statement Cannot Replace Substantive Trial Evidence
Delhi High Court holds that a Section 164 statement cannot substitute for substantive testimony at trial.
Delhi High Court
Published reports in this archive, newest first.
Delhi High Court: Father-in-law not liable under DV Act simply for not controlling adult son
The Delhi High Court has ruled that a father-in-law cannot be held responsible under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act merely because he...
Delhi Court Seeks Police Report on Plea Against CM Rekha Gupta Over Hanuman Remark
A Delhi court has asked the Delhi Police to submit a status report on a complaint seeking registration of an FIR against Chief Minister Rekha...
Magistrates Must Record Complainant Evidence Before Accused Hearing
The Delhi High Court clarified the sequence for examining complainants and hearing proposed accused persons under Section 223 of the BNSS.
Delhi HC examines challenge to 15% deputation quota for Additional Public Prosecutors
The Delhi High Court has sought a response from the Delhi government on a public interest litigation questioning the decision to allow a portion of...
Delhi High Court Applauds Junior Advocate for Taking the Lead as Senior Lets Him Argue
The Delhi High Court has praised a young advocate for stepping up and arguing a case independently, while also commending his senior for allowing him...
Delhi High Court declines plea to suspend Raju Kumar Singh’s conviction in firing death case
The Delhi High Court has refused to suspend the conviction of Bihar BJP MLA Raju Kumar Singh in a case stemming from the death of...
Foreign Nationals May Register Marriage Under Special Marriage Act
Delhi High Court confirms a citizenship-free registration route for marriages between two foreign nationals under the Special Marriage Act.
Visa Does Not Guarantee Foreign Nationals Entry
Delhi High Court holds that a valid visa does not create an enforceable right for a foreign national to enter India.
Bank Fear Cannot Sustain Lookout Circular Indefinitely
Delhi High Court quashes a bank-initiated lookout circular after finding no evidence of an absconding risk.