The reportRead the court document for its full terms
The Bombay High Court on 27 October 2026 held that percentage predeposit under Section 112(8)(b) does not extend to disputed interest alone where the entire tax has been paid.
Judge / Bench — M.S. Karnik and Sandesh D. Patil, JJ.; judgment by M.S. Karnik, J.
Allowing Roadway Solutions India Infra. Limited’s petitions (2026:BHC-AS:43662-DB), it quashed recovery communications and bank notices and directed withdrawal of the resulting debit restrictions. The interest dispute and refund claim remain open.
Advocates appearing — Petitioner: Darius Shroff, Senior Advocate, with Parag Khandhar, Kiran Chavan and Tapan Radkar, instructed by Cenex Legal LLP; State: Shruti D. Vyas, Additional Government Pleader, with A.R. Deolekar, AGP.
Explore topicsGST