In a decisive ruling, the Delhi High Court dismissed Shivinder Mohan Singh’s impassioned plea to travel overseas for his sons’ graduation ceremony. Justice Dharmesh Sharma, presiding over the single-judge bench, pointed to Singh’s substantial assets abroad as grounds for concern that he might evade returning to India amidst ongoing investigations.
The courtroom drama unfolded against a backdrop of legal maneuvering, with Singh’s legal team, led by Senior Advocate Amit Sibal, arguing vehemently for the temporary lifting of restrictions. They underscored the personal significance of the graduation ceremony, contrasting it with the weighty allegations of financial misconduct involving billions siphoned offshore.
In a firm rebuff, Justice Sharma upheld the lower court’s decision and underscored the national interest in safeguarding economic integrity. “While acknowledging the emotional weight of familial obligations,” the judge remarked, “national interests and investor protections must take precedence.”
The ruling underscores the complexities at the intersection of personal liberties and public accountability, resonating with broader implications for corporate governance and legal scrutiny in India’s financial sectors.
