In a move that blurs the line between spiritual reverence and intellectual property rights, Osho Friends International has approached the Delhi High Court with a striking plea: block anyone from trademarking the name “Osho.”
The association—comprising followers of the mystic philosopher Osho—has asked the court to direct the Trademark Registry to place “Osho” on its list of prohibited marks, effectively sealing it off from commercial registration. The plea contends that the name, like those of revered religious figures, deserves insulation from branding and merchandising.
Responding to the petition, Justice Saurabh Banerjee issued notice to the Centre and the Trademark Registry, inviting their stance on the matter. Written submissions, capped at three pages, are expected from the parties involved.
Prohibited marks aren’t your run-of-the-mill refusals. They’re reserved for names, symbols, and phrases considered off-limits due to legal, cultural, ethical, or religious sensitivities. The current list includes everything from national insignia to names of saints and spiritual leaders—figures whose identities are viewed as communal heritage rather than private property.
The petition draws parallels between Osho and those already shielded—like Swami Vivekananda, Guru Nanak, and Sai Baba—arguing that the philosopher’s spiritual legacy has amassed a similarly deep and enduring following. The idea, the plea implies, is not just about protecting a name, but preserving a cultural phenomenon from being commodified.
The Court has signaled it will revisit the matter in July 2025, and until then, the name “Osho” floats in legal limbo—somewhere between guru and brand.
