Supreme Court—Civil Appeals—IBC, 2016—Sections 7, 9, 10, 12A and 65—CIRP initiated through fraudulent and collusive Section 9 application—AA empowered to recall admission founded on fraudulent jurisdictional facts; however, CIRP, having become in rem, may continue if larger stakeholder interests warrant—NCLAT judgment set aside; CIRP restored for fresh decision on continuation. Date of Judgement—30.09.2026.
Orris Infrastructure Private Limited V. Rakesh Kumar Gupta and Ors.
By Hania Zahoor
The reportRead the court document for its full terms
Continue reading
View court archive →More from Supreme Court
Sainaba V. State of Kerala and Anr.
Supreme Court—appeal against reversal of conviction under S.138 NI Act; demand notice sent by registered post to drawer’s address but received by his mother. Applying...
By Hania ZahoorRead case file →
Sterling Holiday Resorts Limited V. M/S P.M Associates and Ors.
Supreme Court—Civil Appeals—SARFAESI Act, 2002—Auction sale of secured resort—Rules 8 and 9 of 2002 Rules mandatory—bid received during subsisting restraint, sale concluded before thirty-day period,...
By Hania ZahoorRead case file →
M/S Awadhesh Singh Gautam V. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Supreme Court—Civil Appeals—Recovery under distinct PMGSY contracts—Recovery order unsupported by contractual clauses and passed without notice/hearing or CEO sanction—Clause 4.1 SBD violated—disputed overpayment not an...
By Hania ZahoorRead case file →