In a sharp critique of systemic inertia, the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has demanded the state government explain its reluctance to evict former ministers and legislators overstaying in official residences. These accommodations, meant for active officeholders, remain occupied despite the occupants holding no public office.
Presiding over the case, the Division Bench of Chief Justice Tashi Rabstan and Justice MA Chowdhary expressed dismay at the Estates Department’s failure to enforce evictions. The judges questioned why unauthorized residents were not paying commercial rental rates for their prolonged occupation.
“The Estates Department’s inaction, even after the conclusion of assembly elections and the formation of a new government, raises serious concerns,” the Bench observed. The Court emphasized that mere requests for vacating accommodations were inadequate when occupants lacked any legal claim to remain.
A recent government submission revealed 33 individuals occupying state accommodations. While four vacated upon request, most remain ensconced, prompting the Court to seek a detailed explanation. Among the key demands:
- Clarification on eviction steps taken and notices issued.
- An account of occupants evicted so far.
- Justification for the absence of commercial rental charges for unauthorized occupancy.
The Estates Department’s Commissioner/Secretary has been directed to appear personally to address these points.
The next hearing is scheduled for December 12, with the Court signaling its intent to hold the government accountable for its apparent complacency.
