The Supreme Court has ruled that disciplinary proceedings cannot be initiated against quasi-judicial officers solely for passing incorrect orders, provided there is no evidence of misconduct, corruption, or external influence.
In a case involving a former Tehsildar, the Court overturned disciplinary actions taken 14 years after he issued a land settlement order. The judgment emphasized that an incorrect decision made in good faith does not warrant punitive measures.
The ruling came in response to an appeal where the officer was charged with allegedly causing a loss to the state. Initially, a Single Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court had quashed the charge sheet due to excessive delay. However, a Division Bench reinstated the proceedings, relying on precedent that allowed disciplinary action for negligent acts that resulted in undue benefits.
The Supreme Court, in its verdict, reaffirmed that only proven misconduct—such as dishonesty or improper influence—can justify such proceedings. Citing past rulings, the Court highlighted that judicial officers should not be penalized for errors unless there is clear evidence of wrongdoing.
By setting aside the High Court’s Division Bench order, the Supreme Court reinforced protections for quasi-judicial officers, ensuring that decisions made in good faith do not lead to unwarranted disciplinary actions.
