Contract as Whole Determines Arbitration Seat, Supreme Court Rules
Supreme Court rules that a named venue is not automatically the arbitral seat when the contract points to two places.
Published reports in this archive, newest first.
Supreme Court rules that a named venue is not automatically the arbitral seat when the contract points to two places.
The Supreme Court referred related contract disputes to arbitration despite overlap with a Korean proceeding.
The Supreme Court has dismissed two long-running appeals between the National Highways Authority of India and Hindustan Construction Company. In the first, the Court found...
The Supreme Court has ruled that an arbitral tribunal cannot award pre-reference interest when the parties’ contract expressly excludes such claims. In North Eastern Electric...
The Supreme Court has invalidated an arbitral tribunal’s appointment after finding no evidence that the opposing party consented to it. The tribunal had proceeded despite...
India’s Supreme Court has clarified that depositing an arbitral award in court does not automatically discharge the debtor or stop interest from accruing. Interest ordinarily...