Trial courts across the country have been told to pause and check one crucial box before a criminal trial moves forward: does the accused know their right to a lawyer?
The Supreme Court has directed that every accused person must be clearly informed—on record—of their right to legal representation, including access to free legal aid if they cannot afford counsel. This disclosure, the Court said, must happen before any witness testimony is recorded, and trial courts must formally note the offer, the response, and the steps taken thereafter.
The instruction came from a bench led by Justices Sanjay Kumar and K. Vinod Chandran, which has asked Chief Justices of all High Courts to ensure the rule is followed uniformly in trial courts nationwide.
The ruling emerged from a bail appeal involving a woman arrested in a narcotics case linked to a Customs seizure. She had spent more than four years in custody while the trial inched forward. The Court noted that a co-accused from the same flight had already secured bail, tipping the balance in her favour.
But the larger concern lay elsewhere.
During the trial, key prosecution witnesses were initially not cross-examined. Only later—after the accused engaged counsel and was permitted to recall witnesses—did that process take place. For the Court, this was not an isolated lapse but a symptom of a deeper, recurring problem: accused persons navigating criminal trials without meaningful legal assistance.
That, the bench said, cannot be allowed to continue.
Trial courts, the Court stressed, have an active duty—not a passive one—to inform accused persons of their rights. Simply assuming awareness is not enough. The safeguard must live in practice, not just in rulebooks.
To that end, the Court has made it mandatory for trial courts to:
-
Inform the accused of their right to legal representation and free legal aid where applicable
-
Record the offer of legal aid
-
Note the accused’s response
-
Document the action taken
All of this must be completed and recorded before witness examination begins.
Calling the requirement non-negotiable, the Court underlined that procedural fairness is not a technicality—it is the backbone of a fair trial.
With these directions now sent down the judicial ladder, the message is unmistakable: justice cannot move forward unless the accused is first equipped to defend themselves.
