Editorial Team

Residents sought enforcement of a government order locating the Niabat headquarters at Taintly and protection against an apprehended move to another location.

A successive Article 227 challenge sought to obstruct execution of a 1997 decree on grounds already litigated through revisions, review proceedings and Supreme Court petitions.

Defendants challenged permission to file a replication in a property suit.

A housing cooperative claimed exemption from stamp duty and registration fees under the Prime Minister’s 1937 order.

Successors claiming tenancy-based ownership under Sections 4 and 8 of the Agrarian Reforms Act challenged restoration of other co-sharers’ land.

A review petition challenged adverse observations and a perjury show-cause notice issued when the underlying petition was dismissed.

A tenant appealed an interlocutory direction to deposit arrears and monthly occupational charges.

A Division Bench of the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court affirmed that acquisition had lapsed: invoking urgency powers did not displace the two-year award limit where eighty per cent compensation had not been tendered as required.

Plaintiffs challenging registered sale deeds nearly two decades later sought to prevent the purchaser in settled possession from building on the land.

An agrarian appellate authority condoned roughly thirty-one years’ delay in challenging mutations by faulting the opposite parties for not proving the appellant’s earlier knowledge.